
When parents separate, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia can make parenting orders (often called children’s orders) that dictate who a child lives with, spends time with, communicates with or any other aspect of their care. These orders are legally binding whether they arise from agreement (consent orders) or after a defended hearing, and they remain in force until varied or discharged by a court. Under section 70NAC of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) a parent, guardian or anyone else bound by a parenting order must not act inconsistently with it, nor must they fail to do something the order requires.
If you are worried that your children’s orders have been breached, or you have been served with a contravention application, then prompt, informed advice can make all the difference.
Stanley & Co Lawyers are Adelaide-based family-law specialists with deep expertise in parenting compliance and enforcement. We cut through the jargon, explain your rights in plain English, and fight tenaciously for a result that keeps your child’s best interests front and centre.
Call us on 08 7001 6135 to book your complimentary, 30-minute no-obligation consultation with an expert family lawyer. Timely advice now can spare you months of stress, unnecessary expense and, most importantly, protect your child’s stability.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Block quote
Ordered list
Unordered list
Bold text
Emphasis
Superscript
Subscript
Once the order is made, every named party is obliged to:
A breach can occur through action (e.g. unilaterally keeping the child an extra night) or inaction (e.g. failing to put the child on a plane as agreed).
The Act identifies four broad ways to contravene an order (s 70NAC):
Where a party believes the other has breached, an application for contravention proceedings can be filed. The court must then determine, on the balance of probabilities (s 70NAE), whether a contravention occurred and, if so, what remedy is appropriate.
The legislation recognises that life can throw up genuine barriers to strict compliance. Section 70NAD sets out what amounts to a reasonable excuse, including:
Importantly, you must prove that you acted for the shortest practicable time consistent with the child’s safety. If the court accepts the excuse, no penalty will be imposed, but it may adjust the order to avoid future conflict.
When a breach is proved and no reasonable excuse exists, the range of court responses escalates in seriousness (Subdivision B & C):
In addition, the court can order the contravening party to pay the other parent’s legal costs and any losses reasonably incurred (for example, wasted airfares). A record of contravention may also influence future applications to alter parental responsibility.
Judges weigh:
The objective is not punishment for its own sake but to secure ongoing compliance so the child’s routine, and relationship with each parent, is protected.
If you are the accused party, don’t ignore the application. Gather evidence supporting any reasonable excuse (medical certificates, police reports, travel documentation) and seek legal representation.
Contravention proceedings are procedurally technical. Choosing the wrong box on the application form, mis-citing sections or failing to serve documents correctly can see your case dismissed or costs awarded against you. An experienced family lawyer will:
27
Combined Years Of Experience



